- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 14:43:23 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org, David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
David, It is allowed already: [29] Update = Prologue ( Update1 ( ';' Update )? )? 'Update' can be empty hence ( ';' <empty> )? which is a trailing ';' http://www.sparql.org/update-validator.html Andy On 25/05/12 17:56, David Booth wrote: > The SPARQL Update syntax currently PROHIBITS a trailing semicolon at the > end of the last update statement: > > [30] Update ::= Prologue ( Update1 ( ';' Update )? )? > > although it REQUIRES a semicolon after all other update statements in an > update operation. I realize that the semicolon was intended to be a > separator rather than a terminator, but in practice this restriction > just becomes a pointless annoyance to users. Programming language > designers learned this lesson many years ago. > > Please relax this restriction to allow extra semicolons. > > Thanks! > >
Received on Saturday, 26 May 2012 13:43:56 UTC