- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 15:26:07 -0400
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
- Cc: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com>, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Regarding DB-22, I am satisfied with this resolution. Thank you, David --------------------- From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com> Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 08:09:28 +0200 To: "public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org> Message-ID: <9DA51FFE5E84464082D7A089342DEEE80138CF539998@ATVIES9917WMSX.ww300.siemens.net> Hi David, Following your suggestion, we have in the latest Editor's draft at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml#create we have changed "If the graph already exists, then a failure SHOULD be returned, except when the SILENT keyword is used." to "If the graph already exists, then a failure SHOULD be returned, except when the SILENT keyword is used; in either case, the contents of already existing graphs remain unchanged." We'd appreciate if you could briefly acknowledge that your comment has been addressed. Axel, on behalf of the SPARQL WG > At http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-update/#create > I suggest adding the sentence: "If the graph already exists then its > content is unchanged." > > > -- > David Booth, Ph.D. > http://dbooth.org/ > > Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily > reflect those of his employer. -- David Booth, Ph.D. http://dbooth.org/ Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of his employer.
Received on Friday, 11 May 2012 19:26:37 UTC