- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 11:08:45 -0400
- To: James Leigh <james@3roundstones.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
James, I must apologize for failing to get back to you with an official
response to your comment [1]. Since then, a new draft has been
published:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-sparql11-http-rdf-update-20120501/
... which may not address your comment, but does change somewhat how
indirect graph identification is done.
Please let us know if you're satisfied with this response. If not,
please try to suggest some specific change to the document which would
address your concern. Thank you!
-- Sandro
[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Nov/0048
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2012 15:09:02 UTC