- From: Jeen Broekstra <jeen.broekstra@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:43:08 +1200
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
On 18/06/12 09:43, Jeen Broekstra wrote: > I'd appreciate it if this restriction could be taken out, or > alternatively, an explanation as to why this is necessary. Looking at it a bit further, I may actually have come up with a stumbling block myself, which is that this requires a SPARQL engine to do binding of anonymous variables _while_ executing the DELETE clause. This is currently more or less what my implementation does, but I appreciate that this is highly implementation-specific and may make things unncessarily complex from the point of view of the spec. So as not to waste WG time: I withdraw the request for change, please consider this closed. Regards, Jeen
Received on Sunday, 17 June 2012 22:43:42 UTC