- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:23:25 -0500
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
I am satisfied with this resolution. Thanks, David On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 18:11 +0000, Andy Seaborne wrote: > David, > > Thank you for the feedback. > > The SPARQL working group intends to keep this feature. > > We would be grateful if you would acknowledge that your comment has been > answered by sending a reply to this mailing list. > > Andy > On behalf of the SPARQL WG > > > > Regarding this at-risk feature: > > > > Allow certain character escape sequences in the local > > part of prefixed names. Thesa are the non-alphanumeric > > characters allowed in an IRI path. The characters are > > ~.-!$&'()*+,;=:/?#@%_. > > > > I am somewhat in favor of this change, though I am open > > to being convinced differently. On the minus side, it adds > > the same functionality as percent encoding, but percent > > encoding is more uniform, because that is the format that is > > already produced by the SPARQL Function ENCODE_FOR_URI. So for > > machine-generation of local names, it seems inferior to percent > > encoding. But on the plus side, it provides a convenience > > for human reading and writing of certain local names. > > -- David Booth, Ph.D. http://dbooth.org/ Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of his employer.
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2012 18:23:52 UTC