- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 10:00:41 -0500
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <50D1D699.6040808@w3.org>
Archiving. This should have gone to public-rdf-dawg-comments not team-sparql-chairs. -- Sandro -------- Original Message -------- Return-path: <mdean@bbn.com> Envelope-to: sandro@jay.w3.org Delivery-date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 20:42:44 -0500 Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by jay.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <mdean@bbn.com>) id 1ThVum-00062h-Q0 for sandro@jay.w3.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 20:42:44 -0500 Received: from smtp.bbn.com ([128.33.0.80]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mdean@bbn.com>) id 1ThVul-0000YG-Ij; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 01:42:44 +0000 Received: from [128.89.254.148] (port=49367) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <mdean@bbn.com>) id 1ThVuK-000NCM-JA; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 20:42:16 -0500 Subject: SILK implementation report for SPARQL 1.1 RIF Core Entailment Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5D8F0296-54ED-42C1-B120-D975986690FC"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1 From: Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com> In-Reply-To: <1E7BF3339E534A1D827EB68962CCD7C6@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 20:42:15 -0500 Cc: Benjamin Grosof <BenjaminG@vulcan.com>, "Michael Kifer (kifer@cs.sunysb.edu)" <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu> Message-Id: <3192505F-EAB4-42FB-80DE-C9A985081651@bbn.com> References: <ED3DDA08015C40B3B6A584FEF2C041A6@gmail.com> <50BE1504.6030909@w3.org> <A9DFF652-75A2-4A8B-A0BB-0D71A49AFAEF@bbn.com> <64589E1A-B518-4DB9-ADAB-41828EC3C8DE@bbn.com> <1E7BF3339E534A1D827EB68962CCD7C6@gmail.com> To: Chime Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, team-sparql-chairs@w3.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=128.33.0.80; envelope-from=mdean@bbn.com; helo=smtp.bbn.com X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.880, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.024, SPF_PASS=-0.001 X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1ThVul-0000YG-Ij 2efb5638e603208a2d213c336bfd4e1b This is an implementation report for SPARQL 1.1 RIF Core Entailment using the SILK rule engine [1]. SILK passes the following entailment tests rif01 rif03 rif04 rif05 rif06 with the following caveats that don't directly affect RIF Core Entailment via SPARQL 1.1: SILK doesn't currently implement RIF Import. I just loaded the referenced files explicitly. SILK doesn't currently implement RIF builtins. I provided a stub for <http://www.w3.org/2007/rif-builtin-predicate#iri-string>(?z, ?x)) SILK doesn't currently handle prefixes containing ., such as the j.0 generated by Jena. I changed the prefix to remove the . Thanks! Mike [1] http://silk.semwebcentral.org
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:00:49 UTC