- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:43:59 +0100
- To: Nicholas Humfrey <nicholas.humfrey@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
Not a formal response, but I think that would require aggregates, e.g.:
SELECT (MIN(?name) AS ?sname)
WHERE {
<http://example.com/bob> foaf:knows ?person .
?person foaf:name ?name .
}
GROUP BY ?person
If you use PPs then you could write foaf:knows/foaf:name, but then you can't express the grouping, as there's an implicit variable in the path expression.
- Steve
On 2012-08-13, at 11:37, Nicholas Humfrey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a question about what is possible using property paths:
>
> Given this dataset:
> <http://example.com/bob> foaf:name "Bob" .
> <http://example.com/joe> foaf:name "Joe" .
> <http://example.com/joe> foaf:name "Joe Bloggs" .
> <http://example.com/alice> foaf:name "Alice" .
> <http://example.com/bob> foaf:knows <http://example.com/joe> .
> <http://example.com/bob> foaf:knows <http://example.com/alice> .
>
>
> Is it possible to construct a Property Path query that returns a single name
> for each of the people that Bob knows? ie "Joe", "Alice"
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> nick.
>
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/
> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
> If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
> Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
> Further communication will signify your consent to this.
>
>
--
Steve Harris, CTO
Garlik, a part of Experian
+44 7854 417 874 http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93
Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, Nottingham, Notts, NG80 1ZZ
Received on Monday, 13 August 2012 10:44:23 UTC