- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 21:34:25 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
On 20/04/12 13:35, W Martens wrote: ... > However, from the your reply it is not clear to us whether the WG is > actually going to follow "Option 6" as described by Andy Seaborne in > this respect or not. (Maybe we missed it somewhere...) > > If the WG would follow it, we would consider the issue on simple paths > to be resolved. The Working Group resolution is: RESOLVED: Adopt option 6 as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012JanMar/0285.html and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012JanMar/0286.html, EricP abstaining Link: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-04-03#resolution_3 Andy
Received on Saturday, 21 April 2012 20:34:59 UTC