- From: <hong.sun@agfa.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:53:17 +0200
- To: lee@thefigtrees.net
- Cc: Lee Feigenbaum <figtree@gmail.com>, jos.deroo@agfa.com, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2011 09:53:49 UTC
Hi Lee, Thank you very much for your answer. 'If you find that a particular implementation does not behave in a way you expect, you might consider contacting the implementer to determine why.' My worry is that if the implementations are not strictly following the SPARQL specifications, then it might: firstly, misguide the SPARQL user in understanding the real semantics of SPARQL; secondly, make linking open data from different sources more difficult. Nevertheless, I understand this is not the responsibility of the SPARQL working group to make sure the implementations are strictly following the Specification. 'We would be grateful if you would acknowledge that your comment has been answered by sending a reply to this mailing list.' Your answer 'there is no "NULL" and an unmatched variable is not simply not bound to any value and is available to be bound in a later clause.' clearly answered my question, and I am very pleased to confirm my comments has been answered. Thank you very much! best regards, Hong
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2011 09:53:49 UTC