Re: LC comments on 'Serializing SPARQL Query Results in JSON'

Acknowledged, thanks Andy.

On  29 May 2011, at 9:09 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:

> Richard,
> 
> In response to the comments from yourself and Michael, the JSON results document has undergone major changes. It is now called 'SPARQL 1.1 Query Results JSON Format' to align with the other documents this working group is producing.
> 
> The editors working draft [1] addresses your comments. In particular, the description is now in terms of just the JSON format, not by analogy with the XML format. The design of the format has not changed. Please feel free to comment on the new material in the editors working draft.
> 
> The section 'Programmatic Utility' has been removed.
> 
> The design is the same design as the published Working Group Note, which has deployed usage. Moving the "vars" and "link" to be members of the top level object would change that design so, on balance, the working group judges that there is less benefit in changing the design compared to keeping the current design and the deployed code depending on it.
> 
> We would be grateful if you would acknowledge that your comments have been answered by sending a reply to this mailing list.
> 
> Andy, on behalf of the SPARQL-WG
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/json-results/json-results.xml
> 

Received on Monday, 30 May 2011 04:16:28 UTC