- From: Gregg Reynolds <dev@mobileink.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 00:00:45 -0600
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 6 January 2011 06:02:06 UTC
Hello again, Regarding the notions of direct and indirect graph identification (section 4 of http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-sparql11-http-rdf-update-20100126/#graph-identification ): I see nothing indirect about a graph identifier encoded in the query string. An indirect reference would involve a lookup table of some kind (e.g. "URI number 9"), which is not what happens in the query string. In my view it would be better to make this distinction in purely syntactic terms, e.g. there are two ways to encode a graph identifier in the IRI syntax. One is to make it the "Request-URI" (ref. to RFC2616) and the other is to encode it in the query string (ref. to RFC2616). Simple, clear, and concise. Thanks, Gregg Reynolds
Received on Thursday, 6 January 2011 06:02:06 UTC