- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 12:53:03 +0100
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: Richard Newman <rnewman@twinql.com>, "public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
On 4 Oct 2010, at 00:47, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: >>> Clients don't necessarily have a JSON or Turtle parser on board, >>> and while especially JSON parsers are easy to get by these days, >>> and are just a few K of code, demanding one just for error >>> messages would be a bit strange IMO. >> >> Indeed... but I'd say a JSON parser is less of a burden on a client >> than an XML parser, which is less of one than an RDFa parser. > > So we have to decide whether there are or will be sufficiently more > intermediaries with JSON and without an XML parser than end clients > with XML parsers to warrant involving an extra language. There can be no justification for requiring a separate parser just for error reporting. Best, Richard
Received on Monday, 4 October 2010 12:00:01 UTC