comment about LET/issue 57 and http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-sparql-features-20090702/#Subqueries from Jeremy Carroll on 2010-07-15 (public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from July 2010)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:07:10 -0700
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <4C3F4E4E.4050804@topquadrant.com>

I suggest section 2.2.4 of your new WD should reference issue 57 - 
concerning which TopQuadrant has a strong opinion


On a related issue, reading
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-07-06

My belief is that TopQuadrant would object to option 1 (no LET) - but 
have no particular allegiance to the word "LET" as opposed to e.g. 
"BIND". I will check and retract this point of view if needed.

Jeremy

Received on Thursday, 15 July 2010 18:07:38 UTC