- From: Chabot Bernard <chabot.bernard@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:36:21 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <f67429a20903110236h4b43d994m54e248edd049bc21@mail.gmail.com>
Hello, I would like to suggest a feature allowing a recursive research in a RDF graph. For example if my graph describe a hierarchic BOM (Bill of Material) linking "Part" instances together through a "has_part" predicat and each "Part" linked with "Document" instances through a "documented_by" predicat How to retrieve : - All the "Document" linked to one given "Part" and all the "Document linked to the sub-parts of this given "Part" ? Motivation : It is a very frequent question in the PLM area (Product Lifecycle Management) ! Regards, Bernard On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:11 PM, CHB <chabot.bernard@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Sent to you by CHB via Google Reader: > > > SPARQL working group - call for suggested features<http://www.w3.org/blog/SW/2009/03/04/sparql_working_group_call_for_suggested_> > via W3C Semantic Web Activity News <http://www.w3.org/blog/SW> by Lee > Feigenbaum on 03/03/09 > > The SPARQL Working Group <http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/> has started > up and is beginning its work by gathering potential features to extend the > SPARQL language, protocol, results format, and/or general SPARQL landscape. > > We invite all members of the community to suggest features/extensions to > SPARQL that you find most important. To contribute, please do the following: > > 1. Check the list of existing feature suggestions<http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Category:Features>to make sure your suggestion has not already been recorded. > 2. Send email to public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org<http://www-mit.w3.orgmailto:public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>with your suggestion, including this information: > - A description of the feature > - An example of the feature in action (e.g. sample syntax, sample > HTTP requests, sample XML documents, ...) > - Information on existing implementations of the feature > - Motivating use cases for the feature (i.e. why do you find it > important?) > > Please note that due to time and resource constraints, the SPARQL Working > Group expects to accept for further work only a small fraction of the total > number of features considered. The Working Group does not expect to respond > directly to all submitted feature suggestions. > > The Working Group is pursuing an aggressive schedule. Please submit > suggestions by Tuesday, March 10, 2009. > > > > Things you can do from here: > > - Subscribe to W3C Semantic Web Activity News<http://www.google.com/reader/view/feed%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2Fblog%2FSW%3Ftempskin%3D_atom?source=email>using > *Google Reader* > - Get started using Google Reader<http://www.google.com/reader/?source=email>to easily keep up with > *all your favourite sites* > > > > -- Bernard Chabot PLM Consultant PCO Innovation 06.85.19.42.51
Received on Thursday, 12 March 2009 12:27:56 UTC