- From: Paul Tyson <phtyson@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:36:32 -0600
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
- CC: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Please consider defining standard XProc steps for RDF processing. This would facilitate processes that integrate XML and RDF processing. Here is a suggested starter set. <p:rdf-rewrite> <!-- rewrite RDF input in specified output serialization syntax --> <!-- allow input from external source --> <!-- output to port as RDF/XML, or to external sink in some other notation --> <!-- could be static error if implementation doesn't handle specified notation --> </p:rdf-rewrite> <p:sparql> <!-- run sparql query against zero or more input RDF graphs --> <!-- allow in-line definition of sparql query --> <!-- output stream to be RDF/XML or sparql results XML --> <!-- specify sparql version --> </p:sparql> <p:rdfa> <!-- emit RDF/XML from RDFa markup in XML input --> <!-- specify version of RDFa to glean --> </p:rdfa> <p:grddl> <!-- apply GRDDL transformation to input, emit RDF/XML --> <!-- allow xproc to specify grddl:transformation list to append to or replace transformations specified in source --> <!-- specify version of GRDDL to use --> </p:grddl> <p:rdf-parse> <!-- parse RDF input and emit error stream and status --> </p:rdf-parse> The XML Processing Model working group considered [1] and rejected [2] this work item for XProc v1.0. Thank you, --Paul Tyson [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-comments/2008Aug/0024.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-comments/2008Sep/0014.html
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2009 01:33:48 UTC