- From: Andrew Newman <andrewfnewman@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:03:54 +1000
- To: "Lee Feigenbaum" <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Cc: "Richard Newman" <rnewman@twinql.com>, andy.seaborne@hp.com, "Arjohn Kampman" <arjohn.kampman@aduna-software.com>, "public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
Darn, after all that they are around the wrong freaking way. So it should be.
Test 1
=====
Data:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/graph/data-g1.ttl
Query:
SELECT * WHERE { ?s ?p ?o . {} }
Results:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/graph/graph-05.ttl
Test 2
=====
Data:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/graph/data-g1.ttl
Query:
SELECT * WHERE { ?s ?p ?o UNION {} }
Results (this is suppose to represent empty):
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<sparql
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/sparql-results#" >
<head>
<variable name="s"/>
<variable name="p"/>
<variable name="o"/>
</head>
<results>
<result>
</result>
</results>
</sparql>
Test 3
=====
Negative syntax test.
SELECT ?x WHERE { ?s ?p ?o }
Received on Sunday, 23 March 2008 13:04:26 UTC