- From: Andrew Newman <andrewfnewman@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:07:33 +1000
- To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Cc: "Richard Newman" <rnewman@twinql.com>, "Lee Feigenbaum" <lee@thefigtrees.net>, "Arjohn Kampman" <arjohn.kampman@aduna-software.com>, "public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
> Integers don't have the same algebraic properties as boolean > algebra/set alegbra/bags/relations - so I think they make a very poor > basis for SPARQL. I assume that SPARQL is based on this because it > uses sets, bags and a boolean algebra - if it's not then the SPARQL > document has to be much bigger. > Why I should've said instead of "I assume that SPARQL is based on this..." - I assume SPARQL is based on boolean alegbra because it uses sets and bags and that the SPARQL document would have to bigger if it's not basing itself on these things.
Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2008 21:08:08 UTC