RE: Congratulations and minor comments on outdated links!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lee Feigenbaum [mailto:figtree@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Lee Feigenbaum
> Sent: 18 January 2008 21:43
> To: Axel Polleres
> Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org; 'Eric Prud'hommeaux'; Seaborne, Andy
> Subject: Re: Congratulations and minor comments on outdated links!
>
> Axel Polleres wrote:
> >
> > Congratulations for finally getting SPARQL the rec stamp! :-)
>
> Thanks, Axel, and thanks for your feedback along the way as well.
>
> > p.s.: Anything clear already about future plans on SPARQL? In case
> > something opens up and/or discussions about extensions or consolidations
> > with respect to higher entailment regimes than simple RDF, I would be
> > highly interested to join such efforts.
>
> There's nothing formal at this point in time. I'm hoping to help steer
> some guided conversation on various SPARQL++ plans over the next months
> on the public-sparql-dev@w3.org list. Once I get my act together
> (probably some time in February), I'll put up a wiki page with some
> topics and hope to discuss them on that list in the hopes of keeping
> implementors aware of what other implementations do and in the hopes of
> advancing the state of the art of implementations that will inform and
> direct the potential work of a future SPARQL working group.

I've put my notes on extensions I know about online:
http://jena.hpl.hp.com/wiki/SPARQL_Extensions

This is not meant to be an exhaustive list (there are lots of ideas around at the moment so that's impractical - it's the web after all!).  But there are certain ones that do come up commonly.

        Andy

>
> So I'd suggest that you and anyone else who is interested in extensions
> and future work related to SPARQL subscribe to the
> public-sparql-dev@w3.org list.
>
> thanks,
> Lee

Received on Monday, 21 January 2008 12:06:07 UTC