- From: Andrew Newman <andrewfnewman@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 06:56:28 +1000
- To: "Lee Feigenbaum" <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org, rnewman@franz.com
On 3/28/07, Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Richard Newman wrote on 02/25/2007 02:27:53 AM: > > In the absence of the DISTINCT or REDUCED keywords, the specification > gives a precise cardinality for the solutions that appear in the solution > sequence. > Does this mean the DISTINCT part of the SPARQL specification is incorrect? It says: "The solution sequence with no DISTINCT or REDUCED modifier may include duplicate solutions" http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#modDistinct
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2007 20:56:34 UTC