- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 19:59:47 -0400
- To: Bob MacGregor <bmacgregor@siderean.com>
- Cc: Jeen Broekstra <jeen.broekstra@aduna-software.com>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, Richard Newman <rnewman@franz.com>
On May 31, 2007, at 7:52 PM, Bob MacGregor wrote: > Kendall, > > With respect to quads, I agree with you. But it took this > discourse with Richard, Pat, and Jeen to convince me > that SPARQL has come about as far as triples will allow it. > > I still think that SPARQL ought to have a declarative semantics, > and I still think that UNBOUND should not > be integral to the language, for the reasons described earlier. > Does something in the Charter preclude > a declarative semantics? I don't know the answer. No, I don't believe so, and I hope it didn't sound otherwise from my comments. I only meant them in re: yr need for quads and claims about RDF's obsolescence. Cheers, Kendall
Received on Friday, 1 June 2007 00:00:04 UTC