- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:53:41 -0600
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
- Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Thomas.Kriegelstein@tu-dresden.de
The PRIME project has a requirement related to the "unsaid" issue and objective 4.3 Non-existent Triples http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-dawg-uc/#d4.3 The current OPTIONAL/!bound() technique in SPARQL reportedly meets their requirements. <Kriegel> danc: don't miss : http://rafb.net/p/a06a4u49.html <Kriegel> especially the end.. * DanC takes a look, opening window #93792 <antipasto> hehehe <DanC> ah. prime... and OPTIONAL/!bound(), i.e. unsaid. so you guys are happy enough with the way SPARQL addresses the unsaid issue? --> HarryH (n=hhalpin@user-152-3-214-225.wireless.duke.edu) has joined #swig <-- iand has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) --> Kriegel_ (n=kriegel@p54B3165F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #swig <DanC> gesunheit <DanC> replaying... <DanC> ah. prime... and OPTIONAL/!bound(), i.e. unsaid. so you guys are happy enough with the way SPARQL addresses the unsaid issue? <Kriegel_> danc: we're quite happy <Kriegel_> danc: we have some HCI issues over here, we only have to return the label for the most specific class to be used in the UI <DanC> please take a moment to say so in email to public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org <DanC> or I can mail this chat there, if you prefer <Kriegel_> yes please do <Kriegel_> .oO( don't they monitor the log of this chat ? :) <DanC> I'd like to copy you... what email address is best? <DanC> logger, pointer? <logger> See http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/2007-02-28#T20-50-23 <Kriegel_> Thomas.Kriegelstein@tu-dresden.de is the address -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 28 February 2007 21:02:44 UTC