- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 11:41:43 +0100
- To: Jan Wielemaker <wielemak@science.uva.nl>
- CC: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
I agree with your interpretation so I have forwarded this to the working group.
Andy
Jan Wielemaker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> According to SPARQL test 'typePromotion-decimal-decimal-pass' (below),
> adding unsignedByte to unsignedShort should return xsd:decimal.
> According to http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions/#numeric-functions however
> this should be xsd:integer (which makes more sense to me). Am I correct to
> conclude this test is wrong?
>
> Thanks --- Jan
>
> # Positive test: product of type promotion within the xsd:decimal type tree.
> # $Id: typePromotion-decimal-decimal-pass.rq,v 1.2 2006/01/13 15:24:07 eric
> Exp $
>
> PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
> PREFIX xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#>
> SELECT ?one ?two
> WHERE { ?one rdf:value ?oneL .
> ?two rdf:value ?twoL .
> FILTER ( datatype(?oneL) = xsd:unsignedByte &&
> datatype(?twoL) = xsd:unsignedShort &&
> datatype(?oneL + ?twoL) = xsd:decimal ) }
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 26 June 2006 10:41:58 UTC