- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 11:41:43 +0100
- To: Jan Wielemaker <wielemak@science.uva.nl>
- CC: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
I agree with your interpretation so I have forwarded this to the working group. Andy Jan Wielemaker wrote: > Hi, > > According to SPARQL test 'typePromotion-decimal-decimal-pass' (below), > adding unsignedByte to unsignedShort should return xsd:decimal. > According to http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions/#numeric-functions however > this should be xsd:integer (which makes more sense to me). Am I correct to > conclude this test is wrong? > > Thanks --- Jan > > # Positive test: product of type promotion within the xsd:decimal type tree. > # $Id: typePromotion-decimal-decimal-pass.rq,v 1.2 2006/01/13 15:24:07 eric > Exp $ > > PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> > PREFIX xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> > SELECT ?one ?two > WHERE { ?one rdf:value ?oneL . > ?two rdf:value ?twoL . > FILTER ( datatype(?oneL) = xsd:unsignedByte && > datatype(?twoL) = xsd:unsignedShort && > datatype(?oneL + ?twoL) = xsd:decimal ) } > > >
Received on Monday, 26 June 2006 10:41:58 UTC