- From: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:35:11 -0400
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
(forwarding [closed] message for bookkeeping purposes.) Lee ----- Forwarded by Lee Feigenbaum/Cambridge/IBM on 06/16/2006 10:34 AM ----- Faisal.Alkhateeb@inrialpes.fr wrote on 06/16/2006 04:07:22 AM: > Quoting Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>: > > > Hello, > > > > --- > > Please respond indicating whether you are or are not satisfied with > > this response. If you are, you can help our issue tracking system by > > prefixing the subject of your response with [CLOSED] (where this > > subject has [OK?]). > > --- > > > > > > > - Is the case that blanks are not allowed in the predicate position? > > > > > > > > SPARQL does allow blank nodes in the predicate position of triple > > > > patterns. As per > > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#BasicGraphPattern: > > > > > > > > """ > > > > This definition also allows blank nodes in the predicate position. > > > > """ > > > > > > > > > > I think the definition does not allow blank nodes in the predicate > > position. > > > > > > > Whoops, I should read my responses more carefully =) You are, of course, > > correct, and the offending line of text that conflicts with the definition > > has been removed from the editor's draft in section 2.3 of: > > > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#BasicGraphPattern > > > > thanks, > > Lee > > > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 16 June 2006 14:35:22 UTC