- From: Elias Torres <eliast@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:18:24 -0400
- To: Jan Wielemaker <wielemak@science.uva.nl>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Thanks Jan for the patches. -Elias Jan Wielemaker <wielemak@science.uva.nl> wrote on 06/12/2006 11:16:33 AM: > On Monday 12 June 2006 17:06, you wrote: > > > I understand all three problems are problems with the test-set. I'll fix > > > these to keep going with the tests. Is there any interest in the > > > patches? > > > > Thanks send those along. > > Please find a diff attached. The diff is against the XML test-data. Note > I deleted the 'UNSAID' dir. I think that is ok, but I'm not 100% sure. > > > > Most likely I'll come up with more. Should I continue sending them > > > one issue at a time to the list? > > > > Please do. > > Luckily, all remaining were obvious errors in the test-files. I now > cover all tests. Time for semantics. Sure there will be new problems > there :-) > > > > I'm not familiar with this convention. I'm satisfied in the sense that > > > the answer answers my question, but the SPARQL test-set is still broken. > > > Is [CLOSED] appropriate in that case? > > > > Yes. That'd be appropriate. Can you please do that with the mailing list > > emails? Thanks! > > Ok. I'll do that. > > Thanks for the support > > --- Jan > > [attachment "sparql-tests.diff" deleted by Elias Torres/Somers/IBM]
Received on Monday, 12 June 2006 15:18:50 UTC