- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 12:55:01 +0100
- To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Cc: Richard Newman <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Seaborne, Andy wrote: > > > > Richard Newman wrote: >> >> === SPARQL doc >> >> 1.1 Document Conventions >> >> In this document, examples assume the following namespace prefix >> bindings unless otherwise stated: >> >> Prefix IRI >> rdf http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# >> rdfs http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema# >> xsd http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema# >> fn http://www.w3.org/2004/07/xpath-functions >> === >> >> === http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/ >> >> This document describes the namespace >> http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/ of the XQuery 1.0 and XPath >> 2.0 Functions and Operators and XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 2.0 >> specifications (September 2005 versions). >> ... >> Each function and operator is uniquely identified with a URI of the >> form: “http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/#name” where name is the >> name of a function or operator, such as “max”: >> http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/#max. >> === >> >> Two points: >> >> 1. the fn IRI in the SPARQL doc terminates with neither / nor #, >> despite the X* doc using both; this causes a few difficulties when >> trying to expand URIs (surely <...xpath-functionsmatches> is not >> intended for fn:matches?) >> 2. <http://www.w3.org/2004/07/xpath-functions> appears to be an >> outdated IRI, and I see no reason why the newer one cannot be used. >> >> Suggested remedy: >> >> === >> fn: http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/# >> === > > Fix applied (v1.687 of the editors' draft > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/) > > If this addresses your comment, please let us know - if you put [closed] > in the subject line, it will help scripts that help manage this list. > > Thanks > Andy As per http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3121 I made the URI http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions# Andy > >> >> Thanks, >> -R >> >
Received on Saturday, 10 June 2006 11:55:17 UTC