Re: [OK?] Re: fn: namespace

Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Richard Newman wrote:
>>
>> === SPARQL doc
>>
>> 1.1 Document Conventions
>>
>> In this document, examples assume the following namespace prefix 
>> bindings unless otherwise stated:
>>
>> Prefix       IRI
>> rdf          http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
>> rdfs         http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
>> xsd          http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
>> fn           http://www.w3.org/2004/07/xpath-functions
>> ===
>>
>> === http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/
>>
>> This document describes the namespace 
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/ of the XQuery 1.0 and XPath 
>> 2.0 Functions and Operators and XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 2.0 
>> specifications (September 2005 versions).
>> ...
>> Each function and operator is uniquely identified with a URI of the 
>> form: “http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/#name” where name is the 
>> name of a function or operator, such as “max”: 
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/#max.
>> ===
>>
>> Two points:
>>
>> 1. the fn IRI in the SPARQL doc terminates with neither / nor #, 
>> despite the X* doc using both; this causes a few difficulties when 
>> trying to expand URIs (surely <...xpath-functionsmatches> is not 
>> intended for fn:matches?)
>> 2. <http://www.w3.org/2004/07/xpath-functions> appears to be an 
>> outdated IRI, and I see no reason why the newer one cannot be used.
>>
>> Suggested remedy:
>>
>> ===
>> fn:        http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/#
>> ===
> 
> Fix applied (v1.687 of the editors' draft 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/)
> 
> If this addresses your comment, please let us know - if you put [closed] 
> in the subject line, it will help scripts that help manage this list.
> 
>     Thanks
>     Andy

As per http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3121 I made the URI 
http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions#

	Andy

> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -R
>>
> 

Received on Saturday, 10 June 2006 11:55:17 UTC