- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 08:08:11 -0500
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 06:37 -0400, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> > Subject: Re: comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" (Non-respect for RDF Semantics) > Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 22:26:54 -0500 [...] > > The technical point you make is clear. If you can elaborate on what > > makes this a show-stopper, i.e. what one would want to do with SPARQL > > that one cannot do with the design as is, that would be even > > more helpful. > > My view is that this turns interoperating RDF implementations into > non-interoperating implementations. For example, an RDF implementation that > leans (RDF Semantics, Section 0.3) any graph it stores can interoperate with > one that doesn't, at least in my reading of the RDF Core WG documents. I see. Thanks. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2005 13:10:00 UTC