- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:35:18 -0400
- To: Arjohn Kampman <arjohn.kampman@aduna.biz>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 05:25:59PM +0200, Arjohn Kampman wrote: > Kendall Clark wrote: > However, the change from "sparql-query" to "query" raises another issue: > a query request now contains two "query" tags, one for the query itself > and one for the containing element. Granted, these tags are in different > namespaces, but I find this confusing nonetheless. So yr point is that it's correct, and will work, but isn't very elegant. Hmm, I guess I sorta agree. I'll get back to you with another answer. We just went to LC on the protocol spec, and I don't believe I can change anything here unilaterally. > It would help if the containing element would be renamed to something > like "query-request", which reflects that it is the counterpart of the > "query-response" element. Well, it's "query-result" not "query-response", but I take yr point. Cheers, Kendall
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2005 15:36:04 UTC