Re: Comments on last-call SPARQL draft 20050721, section 2

On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 12:27 +0100, Graham Klyne wrote:
> [Unfortunately, the last-call period for this coincided with a period of 
> extended unavailability for me, so I'm rather late getting my comments 
> together.  So far, I've got comments on section 2;  I'll send in more 
> later if I can get them in on time.]
[...]
> 
> That's all for now.  I'll try and do some more later (but I'll be 
> travelling and may be unable to do so by the last-call deadline).

Thanks for the careful review and comments. There's a bit of a
back-log, so it may be a while before we get back to you on
the substantive ones.

We're trying to move forward as
soon as we can, but we'll almost certainly take comments on
the QL until the protocol is also done with last call, and
that's taking longer than we planned.

In any case, we appreciate your comments whenever they come, though
it's easier for us to deal with them if they come sooner, of course.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E