- From: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 09:29:59 -0400
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Hi everyone, Looking over the XML schema referenced in the May 27 working draft of the protocol specification, I had a couple of (very) small comments: 1) The text of the specification indicates that an RDF Dataset must contain one default graph, whereas the rdf-dataset element (and accompanying inline documentation) makes the default graph optional. I *think* the latter is intended to be the case, in which case the text should be updated to reflect this. 1b) In answer to the parenthetical question "can there be zero datasets?", I'd guess that at this point in time the answer to this question is "yes", given the decision to allow graphs to be specified either as datasets in the protocol or via FROM and FROM NAMED in the query itself? 2) Unless I'm mistaken, I believe that the minOccurs="0" on the vbr:sparql and rdf:RDF elements within the choice group of the query-result element mean that it is valid for a query response to have an empty query-result element. Is this purposeful? It doesn't seem to fit with the text of the specification ("either one or the other of two further elements"), and I'm not sure what it would mean semantically, either. thanks, Lee -- Lee Feigenbaum IBM Staff Software Engineer - Advanced Technology Group feigenbl@us.ibm.com 617-693-3765
Received on Monday, 6 June 2005 13:30:04 UTC