Re: SPARQL: Charmod conformance

> does not
> conform to <> (e.g.,
> content is not required to conform to the character model),

As far as I know, it is.

An example of a SPARQL query string that's allowed
by this spec but not by charmod would make your point more clear.

> please
> change the draft such that it does.

More specific suggestions would help.

Dan Connolly, W3C
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Friday, 22 July 2005 01:23:10 UTC