- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 02:07:52 +0200
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Dear RDF Data Access Working Group, http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050721/ notes in section 2.2, "Note that all IRIs are absolute; they may or may not include a fragment identifier [3987, sec 3.1]. Also note that IRIs include URIs [13] and URLs. This definition also matches the definition of RDF URI Reference from [12]." My reading of the re- ference is that this is incorrect (depending on "matches"). RDF allows for example U+0020 in its notion of "URI reference". Please change the draft such that it does not make such apparently con- tradictory statements. regards, -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Friday, 22 July 2005 00:08:05 UTC