- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:43:58 -0500
- To: Richard Newman <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20051218114358.GR17752@w3.org>
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 01:52:28AM -0800, Richard Newman wrote: > > Ah, I see. Without following the chain to <http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath- > functions/>, I didn't know that > > --- > The functions defined with an fn prefix are callable by the user. > Functions defined with the op prefix are described here to underpin > the definitions of the operators in [XML Path Language (XPath) 2.0], > [XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language] and [XSL Transformations (XSLT) > Version 2.0]. These functions are not available directly to users, > and there is no requirement that implementations should actually > provide these functions. For this reason, no namespace is associated > with the op prefix. > --- > > I was under the (wrong) impression that each of the functions was > identified by a real URI, rather than an 'editorial' URI, and thus > op: would have to be bound to some prefix. I'd not come across that > before. > > I would perhaps insert "(in accordance with [XQuery] §1.2)" right > after "named with the prefix op:", where [XQuery] is <http:// > www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions/>. The editor's draft *now* has: [[ The following typographical conventions are used in this section: * XPath operators are labeled with the prefix op:. XPath operators have no namespace; op: is a labeling convention. * Operators introduce by this specification are indicated with the SPARQLoperator class. ]] > Otherwise, that's fine. Thanks for the response. And thanks for your comment. > -R > > On 13 Dec 2005, at 04:30, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > > >On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:08:10PM +0100, Richard Newman wrote: > >> > >>Howdy, > >> In "Namespaces:", immediately preceding <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf- > >>sparql-query/#operandDataTypes>: > >> > >>--- > >>The namespace for XPath functions that are directly available by name > >>is http://www.w3.org/2004/07/xpath-functions. The associated > >>namespace prefix used in this document is fn:. XPath operators are > >>named with the prefix op:, XML Schema datatypes with the prefix op:, > >>and types of RDF terms with the prefix r:. SPARQL operators are named > >>with the prefix sop:. > >>--- > >> > >> So, > >> > >>fn: = http://www.w3.org/2004/07/xpath-functions. > >> > >> I have two preliminary observations: > >> > >>1. "XML Schema datatypes with the prefix op:". Shouldn't this be xs:, > >>judging by §11.1, or xsd:, following convention? > >>2. The only namespace prefixes listed in §1.1 are rdf:, rdfs:, and > >>xsd:. AFAICS, this leaves: > >> a) fn: defined, but not listed in §1.1 > >> b) op:, sop:, xs:, and r: without a definition that I can see in > >>this document. > >> > >> Thoughts? If someone knows the URI for sop:, I'd very much like to > >>be corrected, as I'm trying to write that part of twinql :) > > > >The lastest working draft [WD] has > >[[ > >The namespace for XPath functions that are directly available by name > >is http://www.w3.org/2004/07/xpath-functions. The associated > >namespace prefix used in this document is fn:. XPath operators are > >named with the prefix op:, XML Schema datatypes with the prefix xsd:, > >and types of RDF Schema terms with the prefix rdfs:. > >]] > > > >I had adopted XPath's op: editorial style of indicating operators but > >that appears to create too much confusion. I use a new editorial style > >now, and there is no URL that identifies the operators. > > > >Plesae respond indicating whether this is satisfactory to you. You may > >prefix the Subject: with [CLOSED] if you wish to close this issue. > > > >[WD] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20051123/ > -- -eric office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC, Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University, 5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520 JAPAN +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA cell: +81.90.6533.3882 (eric@w3.org) Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than email address distribution.
Received on Sunday, 18 December 2005 11:44:05 UTC