- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:43:58 -0500
- To: Richard Newman <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20051218114358.GR17752@w3.org>
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 01:52:28AM -0800, Richard Newman wrote:
>
> Ah, I see. Without following the chain to <http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-
> functions/>, I didn't know that
>
> ---
> The functions defined with an fn prefix are callable by the user.
> Functions defined with the op prefix are described here to underpin
> the definitions of the operators in [XML Path Language (XPath) 2.0],
> [XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language] and [XSL Transformations (XSLT)
> Version 2.0]. These functions are not available directly to users,
> and there is no requirement that implementations should actually
> provide these functions. For this reason, no namespace is associated
> with the op prefix.
> ---
>
> I was under the (wrong) impression that each of the functions was
> identified by a real URI, rather than an 'editorial' URI, and thus
> op: would have to be bound to some prefix. I'd not come across that
> before.
>
> I would perhaps insert "(in accordance with [XQuery] §1.2)" right
> after "named with the prefix op:", where [XQuery] is <http://
> www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions/>.
The editor's draft *now* has:
[[
The following typographical conventions are used in this section:
* XPath operators are labeled with the prefix op:. XPath operators
have no namespace; op: is a labeling convention.
* Operators introduce by this specification are indicated with the
SPARQLoperator class.
]]
> Otherwise, that's fine. Thanks for the response.
And thanks for your comment.
> -R
>
> On 13 Dec 2005, at 04:30, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:08:10PM +0100, Richard Newman wrote:
> >>
> >>Howdy,
> >> In "Namespaces:", immediately preceding <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-
> >>sparql-query/#operandDataTypes>:
> >>
> >>---
> >>The namespace for XPath functions that are directly available by name
> >>is http://www.w3.org/2004/07/xpath-functions. The associated
> >>namespace prefix used in this document is fn:. XPath operators are
> >>named with the prefix op:, XML Schema datatypes with the prefix op:,
> >>and types of RDF terms with the prefix r:. SPARQL operators are named
> >>with the prefix sop:.
> >>---
> >>
> >> So,
> >>
> >>fn: = http://www.w3.org/2004/07/xpath-functions.
> >>
> >> I have two preliminary observations:
> >>
> >>1. "XML Schema datatypes with the prefix op:". Shouldn't this be xs:,
> >>judging by §11.1, or xsd:, following convention?
> >>2. The only namespace prefixes listed in §1.1 are rdf:, rdfs:, and
> >>xsd:. AFAICS, this leaves:
> >> a) fn: defined, but not listed in §1.1
> >> b) op:, sop:, xs:, and r: without a definition that I can see in
> >>this document.
> >>
> >> Thoughts? If someone knows the URI for sop:, I'd very much like to
> >>be corrected, as I'm trying to write that part of twinql :)
> >
> >The lastest working draft [WD] has
> >[[
> >The namespace for XPath functions that are directly available by name
> >is http://www.w3.org/2004/07/xpath-functions. The associated
> >namespace prefix used in this document is fn:. XPath operators are
> >named with the prefix op:, XML Schema datatypes with the prefix xsd:,
> >and types of RDF Schema terms with the prefix rdfs:.
> >]]
> >
> >I had adopted XPath's op: editorial style of indicating operators but
> >that appears to create too much confusion. I use a new editorial style
> >now, and there is no URL that identifies the operators.
> >
> >Plesae respond indicating whether this is satisfactory to you. You may
> >prefix the Subject: with [CLOSED] if you wish to close this issue.
> >
> >[WD] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20051123/
>
--
-eric
office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC,
Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University,
5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520
JAPAN
+1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA
cell: +81.90.6533.3882
(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.
Received on Sunday, 18 December 2005 11:44:05 UTC