On 29 Jun 2017 12:40 pm, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > On 29 Jun 2017, at 13:01, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: > > I was hoping that my message would (instead) trigger a broader examination of > the grammars for N-Triples, N-Quads, and Turtle and result in > community-approved revised grammars for each of them. Each of these grammars > has problems. The problems with the N-Triples grammar are the easiest to fix. One does not include the other… I mean, you (in plural, seeing the short discussion on swig) did identify an erratum which must therefore be recorded. If there is a wider discussion that leads to more proposals, we just have to record those as well… (In my experience not many people read and/or active on public-rdf-comments, I do not think you will get a lot of discussion on this list…:-( There are a few lurkers! It would be good to have some testcases annotated as being unchanged, previously-ok-now-illegal, previously-illegal-now-ok, etc. Ivan > > peter > > On 06/29/2017 03:17 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: >> Peter, >> >> I have added this to the official Errata list: >> >> https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/RDF1.1_Errata >> >> Thanks >> >> Ivan ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Publishing@W3C Technical Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Thursday, 29 June 2017 12:42:04 UTC