W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > July 2017

Re: Proposed minor amendments to RDF 1.1 Semantics §5

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <peter.patel-schneider@nuance.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 15:33:55 -0700
To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>, Sam Kuper <sam.kuper@uclmail.net>, public-rdf-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <421d70f3-b2a6-cd4d-1dcc-dc165f764ecc@nuance.com>
I also am having problems elevating a suggestion to slightly modify
explanatory wording to make something that is clear already even more clear to
an erratum, particularly when there is a precise formal definition available
in the same document.


On 07/29/2017 12:24 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
>> On Jul 29, 2017, at 12:29 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>> Pat, Antoine,
>> should I interpret this by saying that the original report should be added to the official errata[1], to be considered by a future Working Group or any other type of refresh of the Recommendations?
> Hmm. It hardly amounts to an erratum, more like an editorial suggestion. But if that is the only way to record it, then so be it. 
> Pat
Received on Saturday, 29 July 2017 22:34:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:59:52 UTC