- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <peter.patel-schneider@nuance.com>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 15:33:55 -0700
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>, Sam Kuper <sam.kuper@uclmail.net>, public-rdf-comments@w3.org
I also am having problems elevating a suggestion to slightly modify explanatory wording to make something that is clear already even more clear to an erratum, particularly when there is a precise formal definition available in the same document. peter On 07/29/2017 12:24 PM, Pat Hayes wrote: > >> On Jul 29, 2017, at 12:29 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: >> >> Pat, Antoine, >> >> should I interpret this by saying that the original report should be added to the official errata[1], to be considered by a future Working Group or any other type of refresh of the Recommendations? > > Hmm. It hardly amounts to an erratum, more like an editorial suggestion. But if that is the only way to record it, then so be it. > > Pat >
Received on Saturday, 29 July 2017 22:34:34 UTC