Hi Richard, others, > The N-Triples document defines two languages: “N-Triples” and “Canonical > N-Triples”. The latter requires a single space between RDF terms and does > not permit comments, and is reasonably well-suited to processing with > line-based text tools. Producers are encouraged to produce Canonical > N-Triples. True, but for a data consumer it is not possible to determine whether a document is formatted in canonical or in non-canonical N-Triples (except by fully parsing the document). Canonical and non-canonical N-Triples advertise the same Media Type in HTTP Content-Type headers and have the same extension in file names. It's nice when data publishers use the canonical N-Triples format, but since the data consumer cannot anticipate that this is actually the case, this does not make the situation easier for her in practice. --- Best regards, Wouter Beek. Email: wouter@triply.cc WWW: http://triply.cc Tel: +31647674624
Received on Monday, 3 July 2017 13:56:13 UTC