- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 08:39:53 -0800
- To: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Cc: public-rdf-tests@w3.org, "public-rdf-comments@w3.org" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
A sufficient amount of time has passed for comments, I’m merging the tests. Thanks Ruben! Gregg Kellogg gregg@greggkellogg.net > On Jan 5, 2016, at 12:26 AM, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be> wrote: > > Dear all, > > Can we agree to include the following tests for IRI resolution? > (https://github.com/w3c/rdf-tests/issues/6, https://github.com/w3c/rdf-tests/pull/13) > – 1 (RFC3986 original cases) > – 2 (RFC3986 using base IRI with trailing slash) > – 7 (RFC3986 using base IRI with file path) > – 8 (miscellaneous cases) > > The following cases were also proposed: > – 3 (RFC3986 using base IRI with /.) > – 4 (RFC3986 using base IRI with /..) > – 5 (RFC3986 using base IRI with trailing /.) > – 6 (RFC3986 using base IRI with trailing /..) > I stand by these cases and several parsers agree. > However, Andy expressed doubts about these cases. > > The proposal would be to include 1, 2, 7, 8 already, > and perhaps discusse more about 3–6 at a later time. > > Please let us know if there are any objections to 1, 2, 7, 8 > (or perhaps arguments why 3–6 should also be included). > > Best regards, > > Ruben > >
Received on Thursday, 7 January 2016 16:40:24 UTC