- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 09:26:10 +0100
- To: public-rdf-tests@w3.org
- Cc: "public-rdf-comments@w3.org" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
Dear all, Can we agree to include the following tests for IRI resolution? (https://github.com/w3c/rdf-tests/issues/6, https://github.com/w3c/rdf-tests/pull/13) – 1 (RFC3986 original cases) – 2 (RFC3986 using base IRI with trailing slash) – 7 (RFC3986 using base IRI with file path) – 8 (miscellaneous cases) The following cases were also proposed: – 3 (RFC3986 using base IRI with /.) – 4 (RFC3986 using base IRI with /..) – 5 (RFC3986 using base IRI with trailing /.) – 6 (RFC3986 using base IRI with trailing /..) I stand by these cases and several parsers agree. However, Andy expressed doubts about these cases. The proposal would be to include 1, 2, 7, 8 already, and perhaps discusse more about 3–6 at a later time. Please let us know if there are any objections to 1, 2, 7, 8 (or perhaps arguments why 3–6 should also be included). Best regards, Ruben
Received on Tuesday, 5 January 2016 08:26:39 UTC