- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 22:56:42 -0700
- To: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Cc: Jürgen Pfundt <juergen.pfundt@gmail.com>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.com>, "public-rdf-comments@w3.org Comments" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
> On Jun 11, 2015, at 10:53 PM, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be> wrote: > > Hi Gregg, > > Thanks! > >> note that the permanent location used as evidence for the transition report is frozen. > > Would there be any way to change this? > It seems much more useful for potential users (and the general image of the specs) > if people see the actual list of supporting implementations, > rather than a list that reflected the state of implementation over a year ago. > Who can we ask for this? That’s a procedural and policy issue above my pay grade. Perhaps Ivan or Sandro can provide some background and direction. Perhaps what is needed is a better way of recording the living status of implementations of W3C specifications, rather than simply recording the evidence for transition. I’d like to have my own SPARQL results available as well along side that of other implementations, for example. Gregg > Best, > > Ruben
Received on Friday, 12 June 2015 05:57:14 UTC