On Jul 19, 2015 12:53 PM, "Andy Seaborne" <andy@apache.org> wrote: > > On 19/07/15 16:18, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > ... > > >>>> The plan: >>>> >>>> Per consensus in an INK Domain call, W3C would like to move tests >>>> and implementation reports to github (via a redirect on W3C so we >>>> aren't stuck there). I propose to fix these errata when we get >>>> around to the move. In the mean time, let's gather errata in this >>>> thread for easy tracking. >> >> >> We can also proxy the implementation reports from the same github repo. >> >> Issues: >> >> We lose control over media types unless we proxy everything (which I >> guess we can do). > > > Eric, > > There are two things: > > 1/ The tests as approved during the WG process > These were the state implementations reported on. > > Will there still be these frozen files (on w3.org?)? Yeah, but I think it's fine to stick them someplace obscure linked from the live tests and the snapshot of the implementation report. > 2/ A live evolving set of tests > > Is the governance going to be the same as document comments? I suspect that the right level of governance is a community group. What say you? > Andy > > > >
Received on Sunday, 19 July 2015 18:20:13 UTC