- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 17:53:05 +0100
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, public-rdf-comments@w3.org
- CC: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
On 19/07/15 16:18, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
...
>>> The plan:
>>>
>>> Per consensus in an INK Domain call, W3C would like to move tests
>>> and implementation reports to github (via a redirect on W3C so we
>>> aren't stuck there). I propose to fix these errata when we get
>>> around to the move. In the mean time, let's gather errata in this
>>> thread for easy tracking.
>
> We can also proxy the implementation reports from the same github repo.
>
> Issues:
>
> We lose control over media types unless we proxy everything (which I
> guess we can do).
Eric,
There are two things:
1/ The tests as approved during the WG process
These were the state implementations reported on.
Will there still be these frozen files (on w3.org?)?
2/ A live evolving set of tests
Is the governance going to be the same as document comments?
Andy
Received on Sunday, 19 July 2015 16:53:36 UTC