Re: Errata Section 3.1 Triples - www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-rdf11-primer-20140225/#section-data-model

• From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
• Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:59:55 +0100
• To: Sam Pinkus <sgpinkus@gmail.com>, <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <53C65B2B.5030306@vu.nl>

Sam,

Thanks for your suggestions! They have been recorded on our errata page [1].

Best,
Guus Schreiber

[1] https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/RDF1.1_Errata#erratum_9


On 15/07/14 11:15, Sam Pinkus wrote:
> In section 3.1 of
> www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-rdf11-primer-20140225/#section-data-model:
>
> "We can visualize triples as a connected *graph*.".
>
> Should be
>
> "A set of triples is called a *graph.* We can visualize a set of triples
> as a connected graph."
>
> Or similar. I.e. you should establish that a set of triples is formally
> called a graph. Also might be nice to establish that an valid RDF doc is
> simply one or more triples - a graph. If that is in fact the case.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sam.

Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 11:00:25 UTC