- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 10:53:14 +0100
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: public-rdf-comments@w3.org, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Hi Gregg, > Indeed, I'll send a fixed Manifest to Ivan for him to update Great, thanks for that! > Where did you find the <http://www.w3.org/2013/TriGTests/> URL? The RDF 1.1 Test Cases document [1] references <http://www.w3.org/2013/TrigTests/>. - http://www.w3.org/2013/TrigTests/trig-subm-27.trig contains http://www.w3.org/2013/TriGTests/, and so does http://www.w3.org/2013/TrigTests/trig-subm-27.nq - The TriG spec (http://www.w3.org/TR/trig/) uses http://www.w3.org/2013/TriGReports/index.html > Not an official response, but _:s is a Blank Node, not a PName, so it is defined as "_:" followed by PN_CHARS_BASE, which doesn't include ':'. PNAME_LN uses PN_LOCAL, which does include ':'. I believe the test is valid. Yes, I think you are right. That's good news. > I can certainly create a new report Good. I'll fix the blank node issue then, and then I'll have a fully compliant parser. Best, Ruben
Received on Sunday, 28 December 2014 09:53:48 UTC