- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 15:51:33 +0200
- To: "'David Booth'" <david@dbooth.org>
- Cc: <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Hi David > I think my reply back to Andy addresses everything that you brought up: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf- > comments/2013May/0178.html > If not, let me know and I'll clarify further. Yes, I think it does. IMO the only thing that might need to be done is to clarify the SPARQL spec (perhaps by filing an erratum as you suggest). If you look at the grammar, also SPARQL allows relative IRIs as value of BASE (http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#rBaseDecl) which contradicts the prose you previously quoted. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2013 13:52:10 UTC