- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 01:06:11 -0400
- To: David Robillard <d@drobilla.net>
- Cc: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
On Feb 24, 2013, at 10:13 PM, David Robillard <d@drobilla.net> wrote: > I finally took some time to implement most of the new Turtle spec. > > To be able to run the test suite in my existing test framework, I needed > to fix up the test output slightly. Attached is a patch to: > … [eliding bnode label issues to be addressed in a separate sub-thread] > * Re-order some triples in the tests-ttl output, so output triple order > matches input triple order (for streaming parser/serialisers) > > These change make testing streaming implementations nicer, but shouldn't > break anything since the RDF is the same. Per this comment and comment 22 <http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Turtle_Candidate_Recommendation_Comments#c22>, turtle-subm-26.nt has been reordered, see <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/rev/4c8bfe7ae424>. If you are satisfied with this resolution of ordering in Turtle tests, please reply with [RESOLVED] in the subject. … [eliding conformance report] … [eliding SPARQL prefix/base issues addressed in response <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAPqY83wjtKj+oUmb7L_HMS5XNRogQ_imyuN=OgWace_N4qY_0w@mail.gmail.com>] … [eliding test case coverage superceded by comment 21 <http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Turtle_Candidate_Recommendation_Comments#c21>] -- -ericP
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2013 05:06:39 UTC