- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 19:15:24 +0200
- To: "'public-rdf-comments'" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Dave already replied to most of the points in your mail. I'll thus focus on the central one that hasn't been answered yet
On Thursday, June 13, 2013 5:05 PM, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
> My problem is: do they match at all? Is this actually the same graph?
>
> <<<
> {
> "@context":
> {
> "x":
> {
> "@id": "b",
> "@type": "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#integer"
> }
> },
> "@id": "a",
> "x": "4"
> }
> >>>
>
> <<<
> {
> "@id": "a",
> "b": 4
> }
> >>>
>
> Or aren't they as the two 4s are considered to be different concepts?
> (Let's assume that a and b are URIs)
As currently specified they would yield the same RDF graphs (modified a and b to url:a and url:b), i.e.
<url:a> <url:b> "4"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#integer> .
Here are the results of Dave's implementation
http://bit.ly/13HJ55o and http://bit.ly/11c7hhZ
and here are mine
http://bit.ly/1414bfe and http://bit.ly/14z6bh5
Hope this helps
--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2013 17:15:58 UTC