- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:22:16 +0200
- To: <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2013 12:22:53 UTC
On Thursday, June 13, 2013 1:54 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 6/13/13 6:40 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > > JSON-LD was designed to be usable by developers as idiomatic JSON, > > with no need to understand RDF [RDF11-CONCEPTS]. However, JSON-LD was > > also designed to be usable as RDF, so people intending to use JSON-LD > > with RDF tools will find it can be used like any other RDF syntax. > > Complete details of how JSON-LD relates to RDF are in C. Relationship > > to RDF. > Are you not addressing the ambiguity that "..usable as RDF..." > introduces? Please find a way to fix that since its the kind of > innocent looking sentence fragment that reeks havoc down the line. > > You have keep ambiguity out of this spec. As I said in my previous mail, I'm happy to update the spec once you and David find a wording you both agree on. So far, I've just seen -1s. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2013 12:22:53 UTC