W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > June 2013

Re: Understanding of JSON-LD values

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 07:50:00 -0400
Message-ID: <51B9B1E8.9090706@openlinksw.com>
To: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
On 6/13/13 6:00 AM, William Waites wrote:
> I disagree with the strong de-emphasis on RDF in the JSON-LD
> specifications though.


I think that's being addressed and more clearly understood over the last 
few days.

> It should say something more like, "if you use
> JSON this way, it makes it possible to do all sorts of RDF semantic
> web stuff with it, in fact it*is*  RDF -- that's pretty cool, but if
> you don't want to think about that, you don't have to".
The statement above reflects the crux of the matter, strategically. This 
has to be the spec's ultimate goal i.e., exude flexibility via loose 
All of this is achievable en route to a win-win.



Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

Received on Thursday, 13 June 2013 11:50:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:59:34 UTC