- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 07:50:00 -0400
- To: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <51B9B1E8.9090706@openlinksw.com>
On 6/13/13 6:00 AM, William Waites wrote: > I disagree with the strong de-emphasis on RDF in the JSON-LD > specifications though. Yes. I think that's being addressed and more clearly understood over the last few days. > It should say something more like, "if you use > JSON this way, it makes it possible to do all sorts of RDF semantic > web stuff with it, in fact it*is* RDF -- that's pretty cool, but if > you don't want to think about that, you don't have to". The statement above reflects the crux of the matter, strategically. This has to be the spec's ultimate goal i.e., exude flexibility via loose coupling. All of this is achievable en route to a win-win. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2013 11:50:32 UTC