On 6/12/13 2:04 PM, David Booth wrote: > On 06/12/2013 01:27 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > [ . . . ] >> A little tweak, for consideration. >> >> JSON-LD was designed to be usable by developers as idiomatic JSON, >> with no need to understand RDF [RDF11-CONCEPTS]. However, JSON-LD >> was also designed to be RDF compatible, so people intending to use > > -1 > > "compatible with RDF" wrongly suggests that JSON-LD is *not* RDF. > > David > > > "..However, JSON-LD was also designed to be usable as RDF.." What does that mean? How is something usable as RDF? Let's try this then: JSON-LD was designed to be usable by developers as idiomatic JSON, with no need to understand RDF [RDF11-CONCEPTS]. However, people intending to use JSON-LD with RDF tools will find it can be used like any other RDF syntax. Complete details of how JSON-LD relates to RDF are in C. Relationship to RDF. Change: I removed "JSON-LD was also designed to be usable as RDF, so" -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:59:34 UTC