Re: The tone of the "JSON-LD vs. RDF" debate (was re: Sub-issue on the re-definition of Linked Data) from David Booth on 2013-06-12 (public-rdf-comments@w3.org from June 2013)

From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:04:13 -0400
To: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <51B8B81D.70002@dbooth.org>

On 06/12/2013 01:27 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
[ . . . ]
> A little tweak, for consideration.
>
> JSON-LD was designed to be usable by developers as idiomatic JSON,
> with no need to understand RDF [RDF11-CONCEPTS]. However, JSON-LD
> was also designed to be RDF compatible, so people intending to use

-1

"compatible with RDF" wrongly suggests that JSON-LD is *not* RDF.

David

Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2013 18:04:41 UTC