W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > June 2013

Re: Media types and assertions (application/rdf+xml)

From: Patel-Schneider, Peter <Peter.Patel-Schneider@nuance.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 16:30:40 +0000
To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
CC: "public-rdf-comments@w3.org" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C72CF117-A092-4641-B607-6F7D4FE9676A@nuance.com>
OK, and thanks for the quick response.

The WG will officially close your comment, taking your email as approval of the action.


On Jun 5, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>

> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Patel-Schneider, Peter
> <Peter.Patel-Schneider@nuance.com> wrote:
>> Hi Mark:
>> It is quite strange to finally respond to your message from 9 years ago [1],
>> but the RDF recommendations had remained unchanged for a number of years,
>> and the current RDF WG is finally getting around to addressing remaining
>> comments on the public-rdf-comments mailing list.
>> You commented that the 2004 version of the media type application/rdf+xml [2]
>> does not say that the use of this media type requires assertion of the
>> triples encoded in the document, although there was previous discussion on
>> this point.   Do you still believe that something should be done to address
>> this issue?
> Hey Peter. Wow, a blast from the past. But no, I no longer hold that
> opinion; I now believe assertion is inherent in the act of
> publication.
> Mark.
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2013 16:31:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:59:34 UTC